Innovation vs. inanity

Four elected department heads are facing challengers in the June 3 primary and four are unopposed. However the election turns out, one thing remains constant for us. Elected department heads remain more responsive to the public, do a better job of adhering to their budgets and are leaders in innovation.

For budgeting we particularly cite Sheriff John D’Agostini, who has turned back millions to the county coffers by reining in overtime and more carefully managing his department.

For innovation we cite Recorder-Clerk-Veterans Affairs Officer Bill Schultz who has created a discount ID card for local veterans. This includes a highly portable digital, laptop computer and printer. Veterans who already have their DD 214s in the county system can get their cards on the spot. These aren’t DMV-type photos. A forward facing monitor lets the veteran see how he looks before the card is printed. The whole operation will be traveling to different locations, operated by a veterans affairs liaison officer. Call the county veterans office for more information.

For non-innovation we cite the new “Respectful Workplace” policy, a thick document that adds another layer of strange bureaucracy to county employment. This one comes with a $140,000 survey of current and past employee attitudes about their bosses and various levels of supervision within each department. How many winter potholes could be filled with $140,000 from the General Fund?

Public, and county employees in particular, are some of the most protected class of employees anywhere. They are represented by a union that will tackle any grievance and they are protected by civil service rules and a civil service commission. This latest scheme is just an invitation for lawsuits from a steady minority of employees who don’t like working in the first place.

Every department has a few employees who are unhappy for one reason or another, such as not being chosen for a promotion. Here, the difference will be that Respectful Workplace complaints about appointed department heads will be aired in closed session, but complaints about elected officials will be aired in public session.

And past employees? This county laid off a lot of employees during the recession. That will be a lot of folks unhappy about their experience as county employees. This is an inane scheme that will further stifle innovation in making county government better serve the public. This is more inside baseball and it doesn’t even qualify as zen baseball.

This story falls on page "5"
Posted by on Mar 13 2014.
Last Login:
Filed under Commentary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Comments for “Innovation vs. inanity”

DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. Is this an opinion article? In the online posting it is difficult to discern, because the reader cannot see an “Editorial”, “Commentary”, or “Opinion” classification.

    I agree that Sheriff John D’Agostini has been a tremendous asset to the county. He might be the most popular elected official we have.

    Eleven Human Resources directors in twelve years might speak to a problem within the county of an unfriendly workplace. Is it a bullying problem? That sort of turnover should merit some investigation. It might simply be an issue with a small group or an individual. At a minimum it suggests an issue with professionalism.

    Clearly the county has grown in the past twenty years since I’ve moved here, and growth does bring it’s own problems. But what used to appear as charming, now leaves the feeling of a “good ole’ boys” network. Our D.A. selectively conducts prosecutions of members of our Board of Supervisors for similar accused crimes. Our Auditor Controller is the subject of a whisper campaign where he is accused of being a tyrant, and on it’s face, it sounds believable. Elected officials taking bonus pay simply for serving in their elected positions for lengthy terms? Planning Commission approvals/disapprovals overturned by the Board of Supervisors.

    County officials, and former county officials, profiting from the proposed new Courthouse in Placerville?

    The unbelievable act of having the ENTIRE Grand Jury in 2013 disbanded?

    In all honesty, our county is far past ‘growing pains’. Our local government appears patently backwards, or worse yet, border-line corrupt.

  2. Concerned Citizen

    Sounds like this was written by an elected county official. Probably the one who is responsible for the Respectful Workplace policy’s existence. Those of us who pay attention can see right through this propaganda called a newspaper article.

Comments are closed

Recently Commented

  • Diane Orciuoli: Well written Ann, Thank you for speaking up! I agree with you 100%.
  • James Scott: This article was the first I’d heard about this and it boggled my mind that there was actually a...
  • Veronica Spires: We love the Blue Oak Montessori program! I am a teacher by profession (not at Blue Oak since I have...
  • Ian Wyatt: We met with the David and Jackie and we are informed that Blue Oak is not over-crowded and that the...
  • yvonne morris: I’ve seen many local kids using this trail for their bikes. They’ve always been nice and...