|

Business as usual at EID?

EDITOR:

I attended the EID board meeting on Jan. 13 only to find that George Osborne, Bill George and Jim Ambercrombie believe that business as usual at EID is OK and that new board members can be intimidated into agreeing.

First, the board couldn’t agree on a vice president to preside when Alan Day is not able to conduct the meeting. Both George and Osborne seem to want to control the meeting agendas to maintain the status quo when president Day is not present.

Secondly, both George and Osborne expect newly elected directors to defer to them. They treat the newly elected directors with disdain if they question any proposals presented that they would adopt with no discussion. Dale Coco and Greg Prada were elected by the voters to not rubber stamp staff proposals.

Consent Calendar items don’t require lengthy discussion but director Prada requested to move two consent items that needed discussion to the regular agenda.

First was a request to approve an application for a $1 million federal grant for a low priority project that has been in planning for many years. Prada’s concern was that if the district were to receive the grant, it would have to raise an additional $3 million in debt to fund the project. No documentation was provided by staff regarding additional EID money. Director Osborne chided Director Prada for raising the issue. Is this how representative government is supposed to work? Intimidation by entrenched politicians when newcomers are raising questions?

Second was a disclosure policy that requires disclosure of material information relating to credit ratings, etc. that complies with securities laws. Not an insignificant issue, yet it apparently hadn’t been discussed prior to this meeting. EID has been selling bonds for years. Has the district not had a policy in place and if so why not? Director Prada was exercising the discretion that voters want. Understand what you’re voting for; don’t rubber stamp staff proposals.

Kudos to Prada for doing the right thing.

DARWIN THRONE
El Dorado Hills

Short URL: http://www.villagelife.com/?p=37601

This story falls on page "5"
Posted by on Jan 30 2014.
Last Login:
Filed under Letters to the Editor. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

1 Comment for “Business as usual at EID?”


DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. The “Gad Fly” doesn’t know the difference from “The El Dorado Irrigation District to the Exclusive Idiot Developers. We know Developers could care less about farming and rural living. EID is a rural irrigation agency and not a stack and pack subdivision water agency . I admit, things change, but the draw to EDC is the unique live style. For years, we have all gotten along. RECALL Prada and EID can work this out. .

    Ernie Louis

Leave a Reply

Recently Commented

  • Flydeluxe: I still remember former county supervisor Sam Bradley who wanted 5 acre parcels telling me how the...
  • M.D.: People should support this county wide and as confirmed by the election of Frenzen who is a slow growth...
  • Concerned Citizen: Sounds like this editorial was written by the Chamber of Commerce and/or Parker Development.
  • Citizen for a more responsible EDHFD: The EDH FD continues to dupe EDH citizens out of our tax dollars with their...
  • John G.: Let’s be clear here, the only disaster at play is if you are a large land developer. The policy allows...