Comments on: Campaigning not appreciated

By: Helpu Seethetruth

Helpu Seethetruth — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 06:50:20 +0000

You go Mik! Do whatever it takes to let the people of El Dorado Co. know – hope has arrived!

By: Carol Louis

Carol Louis — Thu, 24 May 2012 03:41:36 +0000

Dear Betty , I’m sure your event could weather the storm of a candidate.
But your in for a bumpy ride with the new update to the general plan. You’ll be lucky to find any historical site. There is the problem of someones” First Amendent Rights”.
Just as you vocally support and try to protect the historic sites of El Dorado County, we all applaud your efforts and your “First Amendent Rights”.
It might be a good idea for you to be following the “slice and dice” efforts of the development community in the update.
If any residents saw what they are doing you would be shocked. The group of hand chosen people who took 2 years to mastermind the changes stand proud in their efforts.
The rest of us plain citizens only get 45 days scope the changes. Does that seem fair to you? I personally asked the Board of Supervisors to allow the residents of the county to have the same 2years to make our recommendations for our county and I readily dismissed.
It appeared to me they don’t want the residents to have time to really digest the changes. So the outcome will be ‘stack and pact” and “slice and dice” the county.

By: Ron Mikulaco “Mik”

Ron Mikulaco “Mik” — Wed, 23 May 2012 19:39:36 +0000

Ms. January,
Thanks for broadcasting the presence of Ron Mikulaco “Mik” who at least was present at the Clarksville Region Historical Society Celebration. Where was the incumbent? Are you confusing Campaigning with community Interest? Sounds like Mik is the only one interested enough to express interest in “your community”

By: M. Dixon

M. Dixon — Tue, 22 May 2012 15:03:33 +0000

This is a strange letter. Candidates do usually attend these type of events. I have to conclude the writer is a supporter of Knight and Knight didn’t attend, as another writer suggests Knight is busy putting the underpass in through Clarksville and might not of been too popular in the area as he is not in most areas where people actually live who vote and have had to deal with Knight’s endless votes to approve dangerous developments in this area. Knight’s usual cronies are out of area developers. Knight needs a new line of work and we need change and it is time to vote and take a chance for change. Knight has shown us he is the developer’s candidate and not the resident’s.

By: Too Bad

Too Bad — Tue, 22 May 2012 12:22:39 +0000

Too Bad Knight is pushing a road project that is going to wipe out historic Clarksville and Mik is not even allowed to introduce himself to the community at a public forum. Is there not something in the constitution in regards to that? Something called freedom of speech?