EDH fire service doesn’t need ‘radical’ change


I’m writing to express my anger and frustration with recent statements made by two candidates for the El Dorado Hills Fire Board. According to your article, Craig and Sherry Petersen are proposing significant changes to the delivery of emergency medical services within our district. There are so many errors and inaccurate statements that I hardly know where to begin.

I’ll focus on what frightens me the most. I’ve been a paramedic for 24 years, beginning in New York City, at various locales in the Bay Area, and currently here in El Dorado Hills. Arguably, I have a fair amount of experience in saving lives. The Petersens’ justifications for changing our emergency medical delivery system, which is designed by senior fire officials and medical experts, are based on their ignorance of modern protocols and procedures.

First, allow me to clarify some terms that the Petersens (and to be fair, anyone without experience or education in emergency medicine) misunderstand. The term “load and go” is an oxymoron. Every patient requires an on-scene evaluation prior to transport. No patient, even in critical trauma, is just picked up and driven away. They then stated that, “Stroke and heart attack victims require little stabilization.” They are 100 percent wrong. Heart attack victims, for example, require immediate CPR, IV access, defibrillation, various medication administrations, and intubation — all tasks performed on scene by a team of trained paramedics prior to transporting to the appropriate hospital. In fact, modern treatment protocols, designed by actual emergency physicians, RNs, and paramedics, suggest performing these stabilizing treatments on scene, prior to transporting, due to the improvement in task accomplishment and patient outcomes. In following these protocols, with a crew of five to six medical professionals, we are usually able to transport within 10 minutes.

Craig and Sherry Petersen have demonstrated their desire to radically alter our department’s deployment plan of firefighter-paramedic equipped engines, despite the fact that our deployment system is mirrored by all of our neighboring districts (Folsom, Sac Metro, Roseville, Elk Grove, etc). Why do all local districts deploy their assets in the same manner? Because it works! The Petersens use of terms common in emergency medicine (“golden hour” “load and go”) demonstrates that they’ve read a couple of articles or the introduction to EMT curriculum. As the saying goes, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Their professional experience is as a nutritionist and an insurance broker.

To be fair, with the exception of Jim Hartley (retired fire chief) and Greg Durante (retired volunteer firefighter), the other members of the board also lack medical and fire experience. But here’s the difference: they don’t profess to know or seek to radically alter a system that works. They rely on their senior staff, fire chiefs and senior medical personnel to advise them.

Please don’t allow this lack of knowledge and experience to affect the lives of the citizens of El Dorado Hills, both young and old.

As a resident of El Dorado Hills and professional paramedic I strongly support John Hidahl and Jim Hartley for re-election.

Hank Ferlini
El Dorado Hills


This story falls on page ""
Posted by on Oct 11 2012.
Last Login:
Filed under Letters to the Editor. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

1 Comment for “EDH fire service doesn’t need ‘radical’ change”

DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. an outsider looking in(I live in south Placer County), i just wanted to say that in no way can your fire department in EDH bee compared to the one in Granite Bay. The dept here, which the Petersens use as a comparison model is in no way, shape or form what want your local dept to beccome. In the last 5 years we have had stations closed, engine companies browned out and positions lost. Today South Placer Fire operatess part-time engine companies. This is not amodelof success, we now have to rely on engine companies and ambulances from surrounding departments to pick up our slack, which, results in longer response times and much poorer customer servicE. Thesetwo fire entities are sovastly different that it really does the voters a mis-service to compare them. As a resident served by the spfd i do not wishfor anyone else to have the issues we have. Did anyone mention that its soo bad at South Placer that they have had CAL FIRE look into taking over? I know i am removed from the situation, but,i would hate to see people make their votingday decisions made on mis-information. In my opinion, for what its worth, stay with the fire department you have, downsizing means poorercustomer service, and as the tax-payers paying for that service you should get your money’s worth.

Comments are closed

Recently Commented

  • Diane Orciuoli: Well written Ann, Thank you for speaking up! I agree with you 100%.
  • James Scott: This article was the first I’d heard about this and it boggled my mind that there was actually a...
  • Veronica Spires: We love the Blue Oak Montessori program! I am a teacher by profession (not at Blue Oak since I have...
  • Ian Wyatt: We met with the David and Jackie and we are informed that Blue Oak is not over-crowded and that the...
  • yvonne morris: I’ve seen many local kids using this trail for their bikes. They’ve always been nice and...