EID deal not real reform


This week the El Dorado Irrigation District board on a 4-1 vote, I voted against it, put in place a new agreement with the employees association. It is being touted as a big deal, big savings, real reform of EID’s health care costs, pension costs and salary costs.

It isn’t.

I voted against this agreement for several reasons.

As I said in the meeting the EID board’s doubling of water rates so rapidly was and is having a HUGE impact on our ratepayers … and if we are handing out raises and cost of living adjustments to our lobbyist, our general manager and the general counsel as was recently done (I voted against it, another 4-1 vote). And now to the majority of the employees, where is the relief, the COLA if you will, for our ratepayers? There is none.

I was comfortable with doing a max 2 percent COLA for the employees to help them keep up … but not 5 percnet raises on top of that. These are not merit raises mind you, you get a tidy raise, on top of the COLA, just for “meeting expectations” each year.

I come from the private sector where you give and get raises for improved performance, for doing better. Not for just “meeting expectations.” And you certainly don’t hand out raises when your organization is in deep debt and would frankly be bankrupt except for the fact that the EID Board can jack up rates to whatever they want, anytime they want, with just a 4-1 vote.

EID is claiming $3 million savings over three years. That is not the full truth. The net savings, after accounting for all the raises and other costs, is really only about $274,000 a year, if that, over the life of the agreement.

Hey, any savings is good savings right? Yes, but to put it in perspective, this grand agreement that the EID Board and management is boasting of that addressed health care costs, pension costs (EID is still paying out millions of dollars each year for the unfunded portion of the overly lavish pensions doled out not so long ago) and salaries, is about seven-tenths of 1 percent (.007) of our operating budget.

This was not a grand compromise or real reform that will ease pressure on the escalating water, recycle and sewer rates … it was an exercise in nibbling at the edges, but boasting otherwise.

Alan Day
EID Director District 5
El Dorado Hills

This story falls on page "5"
Posted by on Mar 5 2013.
Last Login:
Filed under Letters to the Editor. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Comments for “EID deal not real reform”

DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. Fly on the wall

    Thank you, Mr. Alan Day. Now we just need to find 4 more sensible people to put on the EID board in the next two cycles. You may only be one in five right now (we will try to change that) but we appreciate your integrity and honestly. We notice. Thank you for thinking of the rate payer and for your common sense. We know it can’t be easy. Hang in there!

  2. Thanks Alan. Agree with the “fly” we need more voices of reason on the board.

  3. Mr. Day, the next election can’t come fast enough so that we can add four more individuals who think like you do. Thank you for what you’re doing.

Comments are closed

Recently Commented

  • Diane Orciuoli: Well written Ann, Thank you for speaking up! I agree with you 100%.
  • James Scott: This article was the first I’d heard about this and it boggled my mind that there was actually a...
  • Veronica Spires: We love the Blue Oak Montessori program! I am a teacher by profession (not at Blue Oak since I have...
  • Ian Wyatt: We met with the David and Jackie and we are informed that Blue Oak is not over-crowded and that the...
  • yvonne morris: I’ve seen many local kids using this trail for their bikes. They’ve always been nice and...