EID’s budget claims don’t hold water

The El Dorado Irrigation District’s Nov. 15 press release misleadingly claims a “nearly flat” 2012 budget. Yet gross spending actually is board-approved to increase by $1.7 million.

EID’s headquarters overhead budget surges another$1.2 million following $10 million of overhead increases in the last eight years. Overhead now accounts for a “whopping” 30 percent of EID rates.

In stark contrast, field operations have been cut back $500,000. Just 35 percent of EID rates are expended on the field operations and staff. Why do field operations need to “suck it up” so that Mosquito Road can expand its spending excesses?

Of further budgetary concern, EID is camouflaging $1.2 million of spending increases through an accounting gimmick that increases the amount of capitalized operating spending. This accounting gimmick is so that future customers will have to “pick up the tab” for today’s operating spending. While EID’s general manager may think this “clever,” in reality this is designed to enable him to increase today’s overhead … rather than make spending cuts today.

Can EID ratepayers really afford three public relations people, 11 information technology people, two lawyers, 20 engineering staff, etc.? Are annual per employee $18,500 medical plans, $12,500 pension contributions, up to 10 weeks paid time off reasonable expenses to foist on EID ratepayers while 28 percent water rate increases are in store for 2012?

The board’s hands are not tied. Overhead layoffs can be made; more furlough days can be imposed. The world did not come to an end in 2011 when furlough days were imposed.

EID’s board needs to start upholding its financial fiduciary responsibilities to its ratepayers … including future ratepayers. And while they are at it, the board needs to come down hard against EID management continuing to issue willfully deceptive press releases to mislead ratepayers. It’s time for the “I” in EID to start meaning “Integrity.”

Greg Prada
Cameron Park 

This story falls on page ""
Posted by on Nov 18 2011.
Last Login:
Filed under Letters to the Editor. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Comments for “EID’s budget claims don’t hold water”

DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. Ratepayers do not like their pockets picked. Stop it already. Be responsible. Take action that doesn’t affect the customer, but cuts costs and overhead.

  2. The irresponsibility is on the part of Greg Prada, not EID. For a better snapshot of an accurate view see the graphs at http://www.sierrafoot.org/civics/eid_2011/2011-2012_cost_comparisons/2011-2012_EID_Cost_Comparison.html

    As this comment is logged there is not yet a home page link to that web page on sierraoot, I’ll add that within a day as personal time allows.

Comments are closed

Recently Commented

  • Diane Orciuoli: Well written Ann, Thank you for speaking up! I agree with you 100%.
  • James Scott: This article was the first I’d heard about this and it boggled my mind that there was actually a...
  • Veronica Spires: We love the Blue Oak Montessori program! I am a teacher by profession (not at Blue Oak since I have...
  • Ian Wyatt: We met with the David and Jackie and we are informed that Blue Oak is not over-crowded and that the...
  • yvonne morris: I’ve seen many local kids using this trail for their bikes. They’ve always been nice and...