|

Public encouraged to attend Mather hearing

On Aug. 12 the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors will host a public meeting to vote on the Mather Airport Master Plan and Environmental Impact Review. Approval would turn the small airport into an air cargo hub, which would increase nighttime arrivals by at least more 20 flights per day.

The expansion plans include lengthening runways to allow more landings by upgrading Mather Airport’s navigation aid, or Instrument Landing System, to a Category IIIb, which means aircraft are allowed to begin approach if visibility is greater than 300 feet instead of the current half mile requirement.

Deputy Director of the Sacramento County Airport System Carl Mosher confirmed Federal Express would also move to Mather from Sacramento International Airport subject to the installation of CAT III ILS.

“We maintain there is no need for the CAT IIIb ILS or runway extension,” Bill Bryant told Village Life. Bryant is a member of APAC’s advisory on Mather committee and is co-chair of Communities for a Responsible Mather Airport (CRMA). “Move the cargo flights back to Sacramento International Airport, where they came from, with no EIR. There would be no loss of jobs or tax dollars as it would all stay in Sacramento County, just the other end where an International Airport already exists and has room for the cargo.”

In an article published in the Sacramento Bee Aug. 2, “County Must Face Reality on Mather Airport,” CRMA volunteers Glen Otey of Folsom and John Kerhlikar of Shingle Springs wrote:

The negative impacts of aircraft noise and pollution center on three closely related factors — losses in property values, quality of life and economic competitiveness — and is exacerbated by the fact that a great deal of cargo moves at night. In 2008 — before residents concluded that filing complaints was a waste of time — cargo operations at Mather generated 8,072 noise complaints, 3,431 involving night flights.

 

The impact of jet aircraft on real estate values has been studied extensively. The results show losses to moderately priced homes as high as 19 percent, and even higher devaluation for higher-priced homes. The county has identified a roughly 200-square-mile area where large jet aircraft can be expected to operate below 3,000 feet.  

Affected areas would include Rancho Cordova, Silver Springs, Rosemont, Gold River, Fair Oaks, Folsom, El Dorado Hills (north and south of Highway 50), Cameron Park, Rescue and Shingle Springs.

The hearing will be held Tuesday, Aug. 12, at 2 p.m. in the Sacramento County Administration Building, Board of Supervisors Chambers. The address is 700 H Street, Room 1450.

“Elected officials respond to public turnouts,” said Bryant. “They know for every person who takes the time in the middle of a workday to attend their meeting to voice their opinion, hundreds or thousands more have the same opinions.”

Short URL: http://www.villagelife.com/?p=41511

This story falls on page ""
Posted by on Aug 11 2014.
Last Login: Sun Nov 23 00:24:58 2014
Filed under Featured Stories, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

2 Comments for “Public encouraged to attend Mather hearing”


DAILYREPUBLIC.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. I live in the path of the cargo flights that arrive on a daily or, in this case, nightly basis. I have to say that we have to listen to hear the aircraft arriving! Yes, if you listen, you can hear them, but they are not the NOISE that seems to be referred to in the article above. Mather is the perfect place for cargo operations as there are no scheduled commercial air carriers operating out of this airport which allows more schedule flexibility for the cargo operations. That coupled with the fact that Mather was approved by the FAA for extended glide operations, for noise abatement purposes, would seem to me to make Mather the “go to ” airfield for this kind of operation. As usual this seems to be a “not in my back yard” pushback. Cargo operations along with air carrier operations are best separated. IMHO

  2. you’re right Keith,you have to listen for them,dogs barking at night is more annoying but that can also be ignored unless you’re just ltching for something to complain about

Leave a Reply

Recently Commented

  • Doug Hus: When our water rates go up for EVERY OTHER REASON (like they have been), we will have Coco, George and...
  • M.D.: Not to worry, I am sure the government will buy this project when it sits empty for low income housing to make...
  • been there: the EDSO already has an operating facility at the end of industrial dr. I was arrested on trumped up...
  • Bob Summers: Hi Julie, First the folks at our Unveiling Common Core are not the authors of the standard, they were on...
  • M.D.: The voters will most likely reject a big bond proposal with the county budget in disarray. There are ways to do...