I find it funny that you and so many other people commenting here are willing to “clear” without question the popular person and “fire” the unpopular people. This is the real world not high school elections; there is a due process for everything. So far to me the board is following the due process when it comes to Mr Skeel. They placed him on administrative leave because they had evidence of wrongdoing; they then allowed him to defend himself against those allegations. Now we are waiting to see if the board believes what Mr Skeel says or if the board finds Mr Skeel has not given explanations to clear him. After that if Mr Skeel wishes he may proceed to the next step above the board, which is his choice. Ms Kiley has made the choice to proceed to the next step, but to date no one else has.

If you have proof and not just hearsay about AGM or HR doing inappropriate or illegal activities I strongly recommend you bring this information to the board. If they will not listen or do not act on this proof with the same process Mr Skeel is currently going through, then I suggest you follow Ms Kileys example and file a Grand Jury complaint.