Comments on: Judge clarifies claims

By: helputoseethetruth

helputoseethetruth — Fri, 25 May 2012 04:52:44 +0000

Shame on you if you can’t figure out that this is a b.s. website! Must be a Hoffman supporter!

By: helputoseethetruth

helputoseethetruth — Thu, 24 May 2012 21:07:59 +0000

Matters….cases – the point is, Stracener has the experience. Valentine and Hoffman cannot compare. My hope is all candidates conduct themselves as gentlemen and show their good qualities… not show everyone they are running their campaign like a High School campaign for class president! Grow up guys!

By: helputoseethetruth

helputoseethetruth — Thu, 24 May 2012 18:22:45 +0000

You said it right there Chuck!
So why would Hoffman’s team create a negative website to trick voters looking for good information to see everthing all twisted? Desperate words from a desperate man – Hoffman clearly does not have the integrity and honor to fight-the-good-fight.
I have been to a few candidate forums and Hoffman seems to repeat what the negative website points out….too coincidental for me! I think Valentine is a good guy, but I am sticking with Judge Stracener.

By: helputoseethetruth

helputoseethetruth — Thu, 24 May 2012 17:59:14 +0000

Damn…you are really a jerk! What ever happened to showing others the “best side of oneself”? Hoffman began throwing stones 3 months ago when his team created that “FALSE and MISLEADING” negative website on Judge Stracener – an attempt to assinate hos character. Sorry guys……all the investigating and sending private investigators to follow the judge and his family will not help you out this time. You just keep repeating the same beef on Stracener……..shame, shame. It is politics and views like yours that just makes me sick!

By: Joe Freeman

Joe Freeman — Thu, 24 May 2012 15:42:34 +0000

I thought id check this out for myself. Called the number and was told something diffrent. The clerk told me stracener filed a brief and that made it an appearance. Thanks for the number.