<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supervisor candidates vie for EDH Tea Party support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.villagelife.com/news/supervisorial-candidates-vie-for-edh-tea-party-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.villagelife.com/news/supervisorial-candidates-vie-for-edh-tea-party-support/</link>
	<description>El Dorado Hills, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.villagelife.com/news/supervisorial-candidates-vie-for-edh-tea-party-support/#comment-54850</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.villagelife.com/?p=18836#comment-54850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I keep hearing Knight and Nutting say that all the county has to do is show they have the land for thousands of new low income govt. housing projects, it just doesn&#039;t make sense to me that the Sacog Urban Planning Group will allow this to be the case in the future. I would rather have two new Supervisors in D-1 and D-2 say this county, and other rual counties, will oppose all A-21 Sacog proposals and keep this county rural and not high density rezoned which Sacog and the A-21 planners want in place for their new world order. Which, if not stopped now, will be to the detriment of all rural counties who don&#039;t want the Sacog values brought here or bussed here or light railed here and dropped off by the thousands for their new world order of &quot;redistribution&quot; of living space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing Knight and Nutting say that all the county has to do is show they have the land for thousands of new low income govt. housing projects, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me that the Sacog Urban Planning Group will allow this to be the case in the future. I would rather have two new Supervisors in D-1 and D-2 say this county, and other rual counties, will oppose all A-21 Sacog proposals and keep this county rural and not high density rezoned which Sacog and the A-21 planners want in place for their new world order. Which, if not stopped now, will be to the detriment of all rural counties who don&#8217;t want the Sacog values brought here or bussed here or light railed here and dropped off by the thousands for their new world order of &#8220;redistribution&#8221; of living space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.villagelife.com/news/supervisorial-candidates-vie-for-edh-tea-party-support/feed/ ) in 0.23007 seconds, on May 21st, 2013 at 12:34 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2013 at 1:34 pm UTC -->