|

EDH pair indicted for alleged tax schemes

SACRAMENTO — A federal grand jury returned a 28-count indictment against Barbara Antonucci, 49, and Sherry Taggart, 54, both residents of El Dorado Hills, charging them with conspiracy to file false claims, filing false claims and aggravated identity theft, U.S. Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.

According to court documents, beginning in March 2008 and continuing through March 2014, Antonucci and Taggart obtained the names, Social Security numbers and other personal identifying information of other persons. The defendants used this personal information to complete federal tax returns in the names of themselves and other taxpayers. The federal tax returns contained false and fraudulent representations, including false statements regarding wages earned, occupations and dependents. The defendants filed the false federal tax returns with the IRS through the U.S. mail and via the Internet from Sacramento, Yuba and Placer counties. Antonucci and Taggart requested that the IRS issue the false and fraudulent income tax refunds in the names of themselves and other taxpayers, from which the defendants took money.

This case was the product of an investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Postal Service and the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department. Assistant United States Attorney Kyle Reardon is prosecuting the case.

Antonucci and Taggart were arrested and made their initial appearances in federal court April 4. Both were ordered temporarily detained pending further detention hearing on Monday, April 7. A status conference before the dstrict court was set for May 14.

If convicted of conspiracy to file false claims, Antonucci and Taggart face a maximum statutory penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. If convicted of filing false claims, Antonucci and Taggart face a maximum statutory penalty of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Finally, if convicted of aggravated identity theft, Antonucci and Taggart are required to serve a two-year sentence that would be consecutive to any other sentences imposed. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.

Short URL: http://www.villagelife.com/?p=39185

This story falls on page "1"
Posted by on Apr 10 2014.
Last Login:
Filed under Featured Stories, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Recently Commented

  • M.D.: Not to worry, I am sure the government will buy this project when it sits empty for low income housing to make...
  • been there: the EDSO already has an operating facility at the end of industrial dr. I was arrested on trumped up...
  • Bob Summers: Hi Julie, First the folks at our Unveiling Common Core are not the authors of the standard, they were on...
  • M.D.: The voters will most likely reject a big bond proposal with the county budget in disarray. There are ways to do...
  • Doug Hus: It seems to me that Board Policy 12030 should have the following language inserted at the end to protect...